Despite its modest appearance, paragraph 2 of article 2195 of the Civil Code has been an infallible source of conflict. What interests us in this study is the existence of a promise agreement as a defense of the occupant in the face of a “precario” action. The problem is the existence of two incompatible ideas or theories in the case law. Our objective is to show these ideas and propose a solution.
Some problems raised by the theory of the equivalence of conditions and the theory of adequate causation in civil liability
Editors’ Note: Engaging with Foreign Law and Comparative Law in Latin America
The Trust Facing Chilean Law: An Approach from the Perspective of the ‘Rights Against Rights’ Theory
Two Examples of Legal Transplants in Chilean Consumer Law
General Interest as a Differentiating Criterion Between the Chilean and Spanish Appeal for Cassation on the Merits
Procedural Aspects of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule. Comparative Analysis of the Cases of Chile and Spain
The Functional Model of Legal Capacity: An Analysis of the Regulation of Legal Capacity in three Common Law Jurisdictions
Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Latin America and the Caribbean: Where We Are and Where We Should Go
ES
EN